May 11, 2026

Direct vs. Indirect Contact in ISO 10993: A 510(k) Colonic Device Case 

Theme: Biocompatibility Audience: Medical device founders, quality teams, regulatory teams, importers, and anyone trying to understand what FDA may ask in a 510(k) Estimated read time: 7–8 minutes  Medical Devices: Irrigation […]
May 4, 2026

Your material is “medical grade.” So why did it fail? 

A device that passes material inspection can still fail ISO 10993 biocompatibility testing — and understanding why the difference between a delay and a disaster is.  Kandih Regulatory Insights  ·  The team thought this would be easy. The material was "medical grade." The supplier had used it in healthcare for years. The device seemed simple enough, and the regulatory plan looked clean.
April 27, 2026

Biocompatibility Testing: When Customers Demand It But Suppliers Don’t Have It

A founder imports a simple Class I medical device. No electronics. No software. No implant. No dramatic risk profile. The supplier says, “This product has been sold for years.” The customer says, “Send us your biocompatibility testing.” Then the room gets quiet.
April 24, 2026

Why 510(k) Submissions Get Delayed: 5 Toxicology Mistakes Founders Miss

Your 510(k) Timeline Is Decided Months Before You File Week seven of FDA review. The email lands. Subject: Additional Information Request “Provide clarification regarding exposure assumptions relative to intended use.” The toxicological risk assessment modeled once-daily adult use on intact skin. The Instructions for Use allowed multiple daily uses across broader patient populations — including compromised tissue.
gdpr-image
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. By using this website you agree to our Data Protection Policy.and Cookie policy
Read more
💬

Chat with us